Re: package review template

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 10:12:26PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> 
> Imho the mistake here is, that it is not documented in the guidelines. If 
> there are secret important issues that need to be checked, where should the 
> new reviewers come from?

It is not secret, it is specific for a package or a class of packages.
It comes from the brain. This is especially true for the integration
issues that cannot all be in the guidelines. As a side note, if there
was only things that are in the guidelines and can be put on a check
list, packaging and reviewing packages would be very boring ;-)

> Even simple items can be easily forgotten, if it is a PITA to find them all in 
> the huge collection of Guidelines.

A template won't help, but removing things from the guidelines or
arranging the guidelines to be easier to read.

--
Pat

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux