On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:23:29AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Fri October 3 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote: > > > I don't think we need that. If you have items that are not on > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > they could be added, but I don't think that a template would be more > > There are a lot of items that are in the Packaging Guidelines, Naming > Guidelines, and the Packaging Guidelines for some special packages (python, > java, perl, ...) that are not summarised in the Review Guidelines. Then what could be interesting is to have something lilke Review Guidelines for those languages, though only with the specific bits. -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
