On Fri October 3 2008, Patrice Dumas wrote: > I don't think we need that. If you have items that are not on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > they could be added, but I don't think that a template would be more There are a lot of items that are in the Packaging Guidelines, Naming Guidelines, and the Packaging Guidelines for some special packages (python, java, perl, ...) that are not summarised in the Review Guidelines. Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
