On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:54:06AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > All the more reason to move ALL mingw compiled dlls into a separate > repo tree. If its got libraries and applications.. its almost a > completely separate distribution in and of itself. I think I don't understand what you mean by a separate Fedora repository. Do you mean as in the way that 'sources', 'debuginfo' and 'updates' are separate? How would I go about requesting such a repo? - - You mentioned the similarity to secondary archs in your other email. Obviously this does sort of look like a secondary arch, but I think there are significant differences -- eg. this work isn't self-hosting, unless you involve an actual Windows host (or perhaps some really complicated Wine configuration??) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
