Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Yeah. I'm just wondering if widespread use of that would be a desirable or undesirable outcome. Here's a hypothetical:On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:25:51AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:OTOH, do we want to open the door to people running mingw-compiled binaries under wine? That seems like it might be a whole 'nother can of worms, though.You can actually run the executables under wine directly. In fact you just run them. Assuming you've set up the ~/.wine/config file so that paths to any non-standard DLLs can be found, then ./virsh.exe does the right thing.
Let's say that Google opensources Picasa. Do we want to build and run that Windows app under wine using a cross compiler or do we want to wait/start a project to port the program to native Linux APIs? I can see benefits to both sides.
Setting up DLL paths correctly when mingw-runtime is installed was one thing I was going to look at.
Cool. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
