On Tuesday 26 June 2007 19:08:29 Axel Thimm wrote: > Sorry I couldn't make it today (and FWIW I will be quite short of time > until mid September). > > On the /srv issue: The FHS is deliberately not providing any layout on > how to internally structure this, as there are at least two very > popular ones (both of them mentioned in the FHS): > > /srv/<service>/[<domain>/]... > /srv/<domain>/<service>/... > > As neither fits universally and Fedora is a general purpose distro we > should not impose any layout on the users but allow them to freely use > any layout they like. There are extended version of this argumentation > on this list and f-m-l > > E.g. no package (other than filesytem) should ever place/own anything > under /srv. Packages that need a dummy or default data location should > use /var instead. I'm OK with this, just as long as we /have/ a policy to follow. +1 from me. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpq1gpP0IaVq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
