On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 03:25:57PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "RD" == Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > RD> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake > > I'm not even sure this kind of thing needs to go through the packaging > committee. For example, I doubt rpm maintainers would consult us if > they wanted to change, say, the %configure macro. This seems to me to > be something best worked out between the cmake maintainer(s) and > packagers who need the %cmake macro. > > But if you want an ack, +1 assuming that the cmake-using packagers > have been consulted. +1 from me, too. Like Jason says it's probably an implementation detail and for example with redhat-rpm-config we've been only given recommendations and have not been feeling authoritatively (maybe it's a grey zone in the FPC's mandate), but if it's considered out business to decide +1 with an FPC hat on, as well. :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpLAfj2XLUN3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
