On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:17:21PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 10:44 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > > On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 10:14 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > >> On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 08:44 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > >>> A possible improvement I could see would be to change the tool to ask > > >>> pam if the user exists, as opposed to simply looking > > >> I guess you mean NSS > > > So... since I know pam but not NSS, is there a way to ask that question > > > (does a user/group exist) on the commandline with existing NSS tools? > > # getent passwd | cut -d: -f1 | grep -c <user> > > # getent group | cut -d: -f1 | grep -c <group> > getent passwd <user> >/dev/null > getent group <group> >/dev/null `id' feeds of nss just like getent. Ville's draft already was nss safe. ... -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpPByXqCAotR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
