Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:I ended up copying the solution that Debian use -- when building detect if ocamlopt (the native code compiler) is available.http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml?action=show#head-14a9d22bff07b51f58d01bb4e79bcbe98e426a7cI built four packages this way, testing on a "simulated" bytecode-only architecture.Looks good. What are the caveats to doing things this way for the % files section? I imagine as long as wildcards are used it will work but we might want to have an example with a comment saying that the wildcard makes it work on both native and non-native archs.
With the four packages I did so far, I ended up with %if %opt conditionals in the %files section. For example:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240571 http://annexia.org/tmp/ocaml-calendar.spec has: %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc CHANGES README TODO %{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/META %if %opt %{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/*.a %{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/*.cmxa %endif %{_libdir}/ocaml/calendar/*.mli Is that not right? Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
