On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:59:41PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "PD" == Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> writes: > > PD> Here is an updated version of the paragraph about shipping > PD> static numerical libs taking into account the comments on the > PD> first version. > > I also wonder if it would be appropriate to include a statement that > package submitters should explain in the spec the reason why static > libraries are being packaged. I think this is nice OTOH, but difficult to foresee OTOH. Some libs are quite easy to identify as scientific/numeric consumable, but other non-numeric ones can also be required for the numerical application. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpOskUdWN26W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
