Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Could you add something to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/OCaml about this? I'd imagine we'd need to say something like "OCaml packages must have a strict Requires: on the version and release of ocaml" with some examples. And something should be said about rebuilding OCaml packages when libraries they depend on are updated as well so that security problems and bugfixes are incorporated into the new package.
Yes ... Revising that page is next on my list of things to do - it's totally wrong.
However before I do that I would like to have someone look over my spec files - see: http://tinyurl.com/2rl4w6 (goes to a long bugzilla URL).
Rich. -- Emerging Technologies, Red Hat - http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/ Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
