On Monday 14 May 2007 10:00:16 Rex Dieter wrote: > If you're talking about the keys, I'm not advocating (re)distributing the > java CA keys, any more than I'd advocate (re)distributing the keys fedora > uses to sign it's rpms (cause that'd be silly/useless). Right, but our packages are perfectly usable without being signed. Without changes to the java stuff, the package is completely UNusable without being signed. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpm2lz4WZS4a.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
