On Friday 11 May 2007, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Requiring shadow-utils as opposed to /usr/sbin/{user,group}add cuts down > on a layer of indirection when resolving deps. Sure, but it also introduces an indirection within the specfile as we'd no longer have explicit scriptlet dependencies to executables being used in them. I think this is somewhat frowned upon, but I can't find a guideline reference right now. BTW, somehow I feel that if the dependency would be on shadow-utils, it'd be more natural to also invoke useradd/groupadd from $PATH without hardwired /usr/sbin (or %{_sbindir}). Anyone else have the same feeling? -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging