Axel Thimm schrieb: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 02:32:57PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 11.05.2007 14:16, Enrico Scholz wrote: >>> Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> Using wrappers like 'fedora-usermgmt' will make life of admins easier >>> because they have to configure their system only once instead of updating >>> their 'setup' package regularly. > Well, 'fedora-usermgmt' is a masterpiece of marketing: Promising the > best of static and dynamic uid/gid and delivering the worst ;) You should be aware that some people think different about fedora-usermgmt. Especially as Enrico is the creator of fedora-usermgmt. So please be a bit more diplomatic and avoid such flamebits, as that might help to avoid yet another flamewar. >> Maybe. But it seems it made lots of people really unhappy, so something >> is wrong somewhere. > The I wonder why you voted for keeping it. In EPEL? I didn't want rules for packaging to be different between Fedora and EPEL. CU thl -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
