On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:38:00AM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote: > Hi, > > I've never added "Requires: initscripts" to packages which contain an > init script before. I've now been asked to in this review : > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=233455 > > I like to avoid as many explicit requirements as possible, and in this > particular case, the "require packages owning parent directories of our > files and directories" of recent rpm versions (unfortunately not in > Fedora, though IIRC) would take care of things. > > So my question : As long as the Requires(...) for the scriplets are fine > in order to get the package properly installed, updated and erased, do > we still need to add that explicit requirement? > > I would say we don't, but I prefer asking to be sure... > > Matthias Doesn't initscripts belong to the always-assume-installed-set-of-packages- so-don't-redundandly-require-it-unless-you-need-a-versioned-dependency? Just like gcc, make etc? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpprikRTB8So.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
