On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 09:35:20PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > On Do April 19 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > If it's serious: I suspect everyone can identify that something > > matching 2006XXXX or 2007XXXX implies a date, and if not a capital D > > won't help either. > > I would prefer to use YYYY-MM-DD which is easier to read and an ISO conform > afaik. Would this cause any problems with rpm? You can't have any dashes in either epoch/version/release, so you wouldn't be able to have ISO dates in the rpm filename. But since you're going to not match 1005 the tarball's name with the EVR of the package, you could do with the tarball's naming what you want (within reason). You could even add a capital "D" or a greek eta in front of it. :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpNVTHXxr59k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
