On Do April 12 2007, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > The date must still be in there. Some packages have used a format > like 20070412svn1234, which is acceptable although not strictly listed > in the naming guidelines as one of the possibilities. (Which is > something that probably should be in the guidelines.) I have a question about the date, in the guidelines it is written: | The date in reference is the date that the checkout was taken. So when I take a snapshot of revision 123 of a svn repository with the current revision 151 and the commit of revision 123 was a week ago, then the alphatag has to be: 20070413svn123? Imho it would make more sence to use the date of the commit of the revision. Also with respect to git/hg, it would make the checkout better identifiable when one would use: 20070413gitABCDEF with ABCDEF beeing the last six (or any other number of) characters of the sha1 hash of the revision. Regards, Till
Attachment:
pgpUbrXeco0ij.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
