On Thursday 12 April 2007 17:38:58 Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > The date must still be in there. Some packages have used a format > like 20070412svn1234, which is acceptable although not strictly listed > in the naming guidelines as one of the possibilities. (Which is > something that probably should be in the guidelines.) Well, since we have a 0.X.<snapshot> scheme, and X is always increasing, does it really matter if a date is in there, or that the numbers past X even increment the right way? 0.1.1234svn 0.2.1233svn 0.3.1334svn Wouldn't those work? I think the only thing we'd want to avoid is the gnarly git and hg sha sums as revisions. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpf2zB1UM2sA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
