On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 07:20:29AM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 12 April 2007 05:31:37 Axel Thimm wrote: > > noarch belongs to all archs in this sense > > Except where they don't, when we really don't want a noarch package on a > particular arch, and right now we don't have a good way of doing this :/ But that's a complete different topic, no? We're not talking about what to have in the repo, but when it is there, what to allow for fulfilling dependencies, e.g. build/runtime resolving of dependencies (rpm) vs repo construction policies (<your favourite buildsystem>). -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp5Uh0aKnTOB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
