On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:49:48PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 13:18 -0400, Jesse Keating a écrit : > > On Monday 09 April 2007 13:13:25 Christopher Stone wrote: > > > Checking to see if a package still builds correctly is more important > > > than a little extra processing time during upgrades. I'm pretty sure > > > people expect full upgrades to take a bit of time. > > > > > > Just my opinoin. > > > > What you fail to realize is that you can accomplish checking to see if things > > build correctly without making those builds go to everybody in the universe > > as an update. These things are not tied together. > > But you can't accomplish checking the maintainer did check the package > builds and works with the rest of a release if you allow old release > packages > > Sorry, but "it builds" is not a good check. Especially if no human ever > runs the result I agree with Nicolas, at least one test release should be used to rebuild everything in rawhide and have thus the result tested. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbEraZEqkjW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
