Re: Re: Unadressed bugs as part of reviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 08:19 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> 
> > I saw this set of comments in a merge review and it struck me as a
> > little off:
> >   > 5. There are outstanding bugs for [pkg] please address them.
> >   This is not relevant to the packaging review process.
> 
> As stated, I agree, it's just too vague.
> 
> What is relevant, however, are reviewers mentioning *specific*
> current/outstanding issues/bugs that ought to be addressed.  
> 
Exactly.  Do you think my proposal makes it more obvious that this is
what we want or less?  (Or is it just verbiage that people will skip
over because it's not part of a checklist?)

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux