Jeremy Hinegardner wrote: > I'm doing a couple of Merge Reviews for apr[1] and apr-util[2] and there > seems to be an issue over the inclusion of the .la files in the > apr-devel and apr-util-devel rpms. > > According to the Review Guidelines .la files are NOT allowed, but I have > been informed via the bugzilla tickets that the .la files in these > packages are required and cannot be removed. ... > [1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 > [2] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 There are always exceptions, though I'll take a closer look myself tomorrow. I would venture that apr/apr-util is fixable, whether that means moving the .la files to -static or omitting altogether. -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
