On Saturday 07 April 2007, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 06 April 2007 17:53:46 Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Anyone aware of anything else? > > It's not just the strip part, but if the library isn't marked executable, > it isn't processed for requirements, so quite often library requirements > can slip through the cracks of rpm's auto req generation. Oh, indeed, I tested that before posting but the test was faulty; requirements end up missing indeed (but Provides seem to be fine). -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
