On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 13:19 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > I figure it's worth writing this up. > > PackagingDrafts/PostRelease > FESCO approves, but Warren would like a comment added to the effect > that packagers should document in the specfile any weird upstream > versioning conventions which they're trying to massage into a > sortable RPM EVR. > > I indicated that I did not believe that the PC would have any issue > with adding such a comment. > > PackagingDrafts/ExtraDistTagConditionalMacros > FESCO is onboard here, but the issue is down to implementation. And > of course there's an ongoing thread in fedora-devel. > > PackagingDrafts/Utf8Filenames > FESCO approves. Thanks tibbs. :) ~spot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
