Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 16:36 -0400, Fernando Nasser a écrit : > Tom's text implies that if you take that route (alphas in versions) you > are sure that the upstream guys are not doing that and that is only a > single letter minor differentiator (i.e., it is just a single letter > license indicator, a upward moving sequence like a,b,c...). > > If that cannot be guaranteed or the string is not that trivial, there is > the use of releases similar to what is done for pre-release tags. > > Are you suggesting that the text should be more emphatic w.r.t. the > risks of taking the first route, perhaps? We've seen time and time again upstreams do not consider themselves bound by any sanity rule when using letters/words. Any letter part in versions should be a red flag. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
