Le vendredi 23 mars 2007 à 14:50 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : > >>>>> "TC" == Tom \"spot\" Callaway <Tom> writes: > > TC> I have added a draft for handling Post Release packages. > > It might be worth mentioning what to do when upstream ODs on the > crackrock and unexpectedly changes to a non-ordered versioning scheme > in the middle of a sequence. Something like: > > openssl-0.9.6g > openssl-0.9.6h > openssl-0.9.6final > > Epoch is probably the only way out here unless we allow something Just proves adding any non-numeric part to versions is a bad idea -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
