Re: [Mimedefang] More on mimedefang and x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Moving to fedora-packaging...

Seeking assistance from .x86_64 packaging gurudom.

Issues we're trying to solve here are:

* The package should be buildable without having all of the
   run-time requirements met (there are things that are called
   out as both BuildRequires: and Requires: that are really only
   the latter.

* When building on an x86_64 architecture, we should look
   for the libmilter stuff in /usr/lib64 and /lib64 also.  (Wasn't
   sure if this goes in the configure.in file, or should be an
   additional conditional argument passed into %configure
   instead...)

* It's not building any symbol-table exports for the debuginfo
   package, and I don't know why.

Can someone walk me through these issues?

David will post patches if we can get official blessings.

Thanks,

-Philip

P.s. Can the list admin please take .eml off the prohibited
   attachment suffix list?



Philip Prindeville wrote:

>Hmmm...
>
>I run sendmail/cyrus-imapd/spamassassin/mimedefang on an
>x86_64 machine (FC5 on an Athalon64 2800+) and it works fine.
>
>To keep the mail server simple, however, I wanted to build
>mimedefang-2.58 on a different machine, so I went ahead and
>grabbed all of the dependencies.
>
>I have to say, I was a bit configured.  It seems that the build-time
>dependencies have been muddled with the run-time dependencies.
>
>You don't need:
>
>BuildRequires: perl-Digest-SHA1 perl-MIME-tools perl-IO-stringy perl-MailTools
>
>
>in the .spec file, do you?  Can we yank this?  I just pulled it out
>and things built fine (oh, after adding "--disable-check-perl-modules"
>to the ./configure line).
>
>Further, if you install sendmail-devel but don't actually
>have sendmail installed on the machine (since your building,
>but not actually running)... then you might run afoul of the
>following scenario.  sendmail-devel installs (on an x86_64
>architecture) /usr/lib64/libmilter.a only.
>
>So, from configure.in:
>
>AC_PATH_PROG(LIBMILTER, libmilter.a, no, $MILTERLIB:$SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
>SMPATH=`echo ../sendmail-*/obj.*/libsm`
>AC_PATH_PROG(LIBSM, libsm.a, no, $SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
>
>dnl find libmilter.so in case we have shared libraries
>AC_PATH_PROG(LIBMILTERSO, libmilter.so, no, $MILTERLIB:$SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
>
>
>should we add /lib64 and /usr/lib64 before /lib and /usr/lib,
>respectively?
>
>I changed the .spec file to include:
>
>    ./configure ... --with-libmilter=/usr/lib64 ...
>
>and it seems to build...  but it might make more sense to
>fix this in the configure.in file instead, as above.
>
>Opinions?
>
>Oh, and do we need the symbol file for /usr/bin/mimedefang
>to put into mimedefang-debuginfo-2.58?
>
>-Philip
>
>  
>

--- mimedefang.spec	2006-11-19 17:22:04.000000000 -0700
+++ mimedefang2.spec	2006-11-19 19:00:14.000000000 -0700
@@ -132,21 +132,22 @@
 %{?_without_antivirus: %{expand: %%define with_antivirus 0}}
 
 Summary:       Email filtering application using sendmail's milter interface
 Name:          mimedefang
 Version:       2.58
-Release:       1
+Release:       2
 License:       GPL
 Group:         Networking/Mail
 Source0:       http://www.roaringpenguin.com/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
 Url:           http://www.roaringpenguin.com/%{name}
 Vendor:        Roaring Penguin Software Inc.
 Buildroot:     %{_tmppath}/%{name}-root
 Requires:      sendmail > 8.12.0
 Requires:      perl-Digest-SHA1 perl-MIME-tools perl-IO-stringy perl-MailTools
 BuildRequires: sendmail-devel > 8.12.0
-BuildRequires: perl-Digest-SHA1 perl-MIME-tools perl-IO-stringy perl-MailTools
+BuildRequires: autoconf > 2.55
+Patch99: mimedefang-libmilter64.patch
 
 %description
 MIMEDefang is an e-mail filter program which works with Sendmail 8.11
 and later.  MIMEDefang filters all e-mail messages sent via SMTP.
 MIMEDefang splits multi-part MIME messages into their components and
@@ -165,13 +166,17 @@
 willingness of your e-mail users to commit to security, or they will
 complain loudly about MIMEDefang.
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}
-./configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
+%patch99 -p0 -b .libmilter64
+autoconf
+%configure --prefix=%{_prefix} \
             --mandir=%{_mandir} \
+	    --enable-debug \
 	    --sysconfdir=/etc   \
+	    --disable-check-perl-modules \
             --with-spooldir=%{dir_spool} \
             --with-quarantinedir=%{dir_quarantine} \
 %if %{with_antivirus}
 	    --with-user=%{user}
 %else
--- /dev/null	2006-10-20 13:24:12.475602750 -0600
+++ ../SOURCES/mimedefang-libmilter64.patch	2006-11-19 17:17:55.000000000 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+*** configure.in.bak	2006-11-06 08:01:23.000000000 -0700
+--- configure.in	2006-11-19 17:17:06.000000000 -0700
+***************
+*** 625,631 ****
+  
+  dnl find libmilter.a and libsm.a
+  SMPATH=`echo ../sendmail-*/obj.*/libmilter`
+! AC_PATH_PROG(LIBMILTER, libmilter.a, no, $MILTERLIB:$SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
+  SMPATH=`echo ../sendmail-*/obj.*/libsm`
+  AC_PATH_PROG(LIBSM, libsm.a, no, $SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
+  
+--- 625,631 ----
+  
+  dnl find libmilter.a and libsm.a
+  SMPATH=`echo ../sendmail-*/obj.*/libmilter`
+! AC_PATH_PROG(LIBMILTER, libmilter.a, no, $MILTERLIB:$SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib64:/lib:/usr/lib64:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
+  SMPATH=`echo ../sendmail-*/obj.*/libsm`
+  AC_PATH_PROG(LIBSM, libsm.a, no, $SMPATH:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib/libmilter)
+  
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux