Re: static subpackages (was: sparse 0.2, headers and static lib)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 10:53:41PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 04:58:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > 3.1
> > - headers in *-devel
> > - libs in *-devel
> > - *-devel "Provides: *-static = %{version}-%{release}"
> > IMO, this should be the nominal case.
> 
> OK, I've done this instead now.


http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/extras/sparse/0.2/ now has the spec I'm
planning to use and RPMs that are built from it.  I'd appreciate a
sanity check based on this conversation.

What's the process to take this to FESCo for approval?

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux