On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 13:18 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > -1 to ask the Steering Committee to audit these on a case by case basis. > Conflicts should be infrequently used, but it's not really something > that I think needs to be evaluated like that. It's not political and > it's not really an abuse of a tag when used correctly. It's a technical > decision and should be worked out by a reviewer and packager. (And > "after importation QA" if we had that.) I had the same hesitation initially - if this is somethign that comes upa lot or slows down reviews, we/FESCo will need to come with a more lightweight way. Though I wouldn't just leave conflicts up to individual reviewers, since they can have bad implications on the useability of the distro as a whole; that's where conflicts deserve more attention than requires (too many requires bloat installs, but don't keep you from using things in parallel). David -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
