On Tue, 2006-11-14 at 19:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 19:01:01 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le mardi 14 novembre 2006 à 12:52 +0100, Michael Schwendt a écrit : > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 12:35:26 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > > > > Well, Core has conflicts with other core packages afaik. So the above > > > > will never work afaics, with or without Extras. > > > > > > Is that true? > > > > The kernel package, for example, has a boatload of versionned conflicts > > to prevent installation on a system with the wrong userspace level. > > Void. > > The right userspace tools are part of Core, so these conditional conflicts > only become active under corner-case conditions and then create artificial > hurdles. == bug Frankly speaking, I am having difficulties to imagine valid reasons when an explicit "Conflicts:" in an rpm.spec makes any sense, and am inclined to think all such explicit "Conflicts:" actually are packaging bugs. Am I missing something? Ralf -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
