Re: proposed "should" requirement: clean "make check" run w/valgrind

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 04 November 2006 07:49, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've just realized there's a better way to write the script above.
> Just compute the name of the program under test from the name of
> the script:
>
>     #!/bin/sh
>     export PATH=@BUILD_DIR@:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin
>     prog=${0##*/}
>     exec /usr/bin/valgrind -v --suppressions=/tmp/cu-vg --log-fd=3 \
>       --leak-check=full --track-fds=yes --num-callers=15 -- "$prog" "$@"
>
> Now, the only variable is the part marked with @BUILD_DIR@.
> Oh.  Also the suppressions file name.

Wouldn't the reviewer/packager still have to know every binary name produced 
and write a script for each?  Is there no easier way?

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgpgw296g2gAT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux