Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 22:04 +0200, Axel Thimm a écrit : > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:05:33PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le lundi 23 octobre 2006 à 14:44 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit : > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 08:08:36PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > Although it's perfectly reasonable for > > > Fedora to provide a default, it shouldn't/can't rely on me or you keeping > > > that default, because, as Axel points out, there's many perfectly good ways > > > for arranging this directory depending on system usage. > > > > As long as Fedora can provide a default and rely on the sysadmin > > creating directories, updating conf files, selinux contexts, if he > > wishes another policy all is fine > > How, if the distribution defaults are in the way? Just put distributions defaults under /srv/whatever if you're afraid of collisions. With whatever being system if you're reasonable and DoctObnik! or wi.drigco if you're not -- Nicolas Mailhot -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
