Re: Apology to Axel and Lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora Extras <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Apology to Axel and Lists
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:36:26 +0200
Cc: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <d9c612bf0610182322ke514b88k8981498fc211ba9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <d9c612bf0610182322ke514b88k8981498fc211ba9a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Discussion of RPM packaging standards and practices for Fedora Extras <fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i

Thanks, Christopher, for ending this. To lighten our moods we can
start looking forward to FC6.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp2zZYsIDbGE.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

References:
- Apology to Axel and Lists
  - From: Christopher Stone

Prev by Date: Re: Extras package enables 3rd party repository
Next by Date: Firmwares, roms and who decides on packagable items
Previous by thread: Apology to Axel and Lists
Next by thread: Extras package enables 3rd party repository
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux