On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 05:08:23PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I consider the separation of firmware from "other binaries" inside of > the FPG to be nonsensical and the criteria above to be nonsensical, and > wish we (FPC) were able to find better criteria. I think the package group's mandate is about *how* to package, not *what* to package and whether it's legal, endagers Fedora sponsors, is in the spirit of Fedora etc. E.g. these goals are set from a higher instance and we just provide matching guidelines. IMO we shouldn't redefine objectives, this needs to be escalated to <your board here>. Especially if something isn't spelled out in the current objectives as clear as the position/distinction towards firmwares and other non-source binaries. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpiGWBKHXnBh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
