On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 02:27:51PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 14:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > doesn't make a real difference. > > > > It does. ;) > > > > The former installs into $RPM_BUILD_ROOT without doing "rm -rf > > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" first. It would need to do this at the beginning of > > %build (!). > hastly off-head scribbled pseudo-code", you know? > > The real world case in FE, I am facing this issue with, does have an > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %build ;) And you consider that proper? This package should not be allowed to pass the review! *Shudder* -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpqwelopUeNc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
