On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 10:33 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:25:36AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 09:33 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 06:06:11AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > > E.g. there exist packages, which want/need to be built "multi-staged",
> > > > with %build containing (often: temporary) installs to %{buildroot}.
> > > > In some (very rare) occasions, packages even require "building" inside
> > > > of %buildroot.
> > >
> > > These are exactly the broken packages that I want to cater with the
> > > proposed changes!
> > There ain't anything broken with these packages ;)
Then I can't avoid replying a bit clearer:
* The issue you are trying to address is not related at all to our
original problem ("free of side-effects")
* Your proposal does not solve an actual technical problem, to the
contrary, it artificially introduces new ones.
Ralf
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
