Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Oct 5, 2006, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So? That's not a problem with the mentioned patch. > Ignoring dependency_libs would break the following case: > - libA.la, static only... Right, but: 1. That's why I mentioned on the libtool ml that the patch should only apply in non-static lib cases (though I haven't the foggiest the complications involved in implementing that). 2. Good thing we don't package static libs (or at least *strongly* discouraged). -- Rex -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
