On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 14:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > >> Explanation of patch: > > ... > >> acinclude.m4, ltdl.m4: Probably only ltdl.m4 needs to be changed here. > >> Basically I replaced the erroroneous detection with the simple check of > >> newer libtools. This step is needed because arts includes its own, > >> somewhat dated, copy of libltdl. Do we want to get rid of that anyway > >> (because we want to use system libraries whenever possible)? Or does > >> arts need this specific version of libltdl for some reason? > > > > How's the best way to use a newer/different libltdl? (Naively?) replace > > arts' libltdl/ with that from /usr/share/libtool/libltdl? > > Or just: > $ libtoolize --ltdl --force > ? (: My recommendation for best is to use what's installed by the system libtool-ltdl(-devel). Without knowing why KDE packages are including a local copy of ltdl in the first place, though, I don't know whether this would be a change welcomed or refused by upstream. (If rejected, your other suggestions would work as well.) -Toshio P.S. I'll try out juk later this week.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
