On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 00:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hiyas, > > ReviewGuidelines say: > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. > > I just noticed that there are some files with permissions 0444 on my fc5 > system installed, for example manpages: > > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 24410 15. Feb 2006 cdrecord.1.gz > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1229 11. Feb 2006 dos2unix.1.gz > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 1790 11. Feb 2006 hesinfo.1.gz > > Are 0444 proper permission bits for manpages / non-executable files? 0644 is traditional but I don't see anything wrong with 0444. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
