On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:53:46AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > > Forwarding this here too. > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > From: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reply-To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers > > <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: devel packages with only one .pc file > > Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 15:11:26 +0200 > > > > I've recently got several bugs against package involving basically > > splitting out only one pkg-config file into a -devel package, because > > the packaging guidelines says so. I've done this for a couple of > > packages, but its starting to get very ridicolous. > > > > The one-file -devel package is totally useless > > I would tend to agree, a single .pc file -devel pkg is a bit silly. > Perhaps the existing rule: > > - MUST: Files used by pkgconfig (.pc files) must be in a -devel package. > > probably ought to be amended. What good is a pc file w/o any other development bits? Maybe the package is question has a bogus pc file that ought to be rm'd instead of split off into a subpackage? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpT4LHDHKaPL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
