On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 11:15 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > TK> So what's the package and what's the reasoning? > > The package is eclipse-subclipse, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 > > The reasoning is that the Core eclipse packages all do things this way > and it isn't a problem there. Yes, that doesn't get a whole lot of > traction with me given the general state of Core, but rather than just > say that I figure I'd get some idea of just why the rpmlint complaint > is there. Well, they aren't configuration files that the admin would want to edit. And Axel has some good points so based on information so far, I'd say rpmlint should be ignored here. Not sure what I think when configuration files are involved as I think Axel's points and mine would run smack dab into each other there. Guess we'll have to reevaluate if we run across a case where that occurs. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
