Re: Re: Importance of debuginfo packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 19:16 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:54:22AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>>>> "JK" == Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > JK> Enough so that running gdb (gnu debugger) on the application will
> > JK> produce a meaningful traceback.
> > 
> > So what needs to be there in order for that to work?
> > 
> > I need to be able to superficially inspect a debuginfo package and
> > know whether it has enough stuff in it or not.
> 
> That's very difficult, especially in projects with subdirectories that
> may redefine CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS w/o the builder noticing. sope/ogo is one
> nasty candidate for example.
> 
> There are some safety pins in debuginfo, IIRC if it's turned on, but
> the debuginfo turns out empty the build will fail. That's how it gets
> my attention to fix debugging symbols at least :)

Indeed, debuginfo being empty is about the only giant red warning flag
that I'm aware of. :)

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Technical Team Lead || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux