On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:10 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:36 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > In this case: > > > > import paste.deploy > > import paste.script > > > > This could reasonably be named python-pastedeploy or > > python-paste-deploy. Do we want to specify that submodules be named one > > or the other or leave it up to the packager? > > > > For what it's worth, Debian has python-pastedeploy but also > > python-twisted-conch so they seem to leave it to the packager ATM. > > Up to developer's discretion, IMHO. Look at what upstream calls it. Sounds good to me. If no one objects today, I'll post that to the bugs which are waiting for clarification (as this isn't a Guideline change AFAIS). -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
