Luke Macken is working on a few python packages for infrastructure and has run across an unanticipated naming issue with python-pastedeploy and python-pastescript[1]_. Our present naming guidelines [2]_ say to use the name of the python module when it is imported. The question is how does this map to submodules? In this case: import paste.deploy import paste.script This could reasonably be named python-pastedeploy or python-paste-deploy. Do we want to specify that submodules be named one or the other or leave it up to the packager? For what it's worth, Debian has python-pastedeploy but also python-twisted-conch so they seem to leave it to the packager ATM. [1]_ https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-July/msg00676.html [2]_ http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#AddonPython -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
