Axel Thimm schrieb: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> Axel Thimm schrieb: >>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:54:06PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>>> Axel Thimm schrieb: >>>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:11:57PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 13:36 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: >>>>> And to cut to the chase: Ever tried to support special kernel rpms >>>>> like swsusp2 or ccrma's low-latency kernels? I did and know it works >>>>> for kmdl and will fail with kmod. >>>> I looked into this once and I'd like to give people a bit more >>>> background from my point of view: >>>> >>>> Yes, kmod fails for the swsusp2 kernel from http://mhensler.de/swsusp/. >>>> But that's not directly a bug/problem in kmod. kmods would work if the >>>> swsusp2 kernel would be packaged exactly in the same way as the FC >>>> kernels are packaged. But that's not the case. >>> which was done deliberately to not conflict with having the same name >>> with a Fedora package, just as the highest mandate coming from Fedora >>> to 3rd parties is, right? >> Right, but it can be done in different ways, e.g. in a ways, that >> follows the general naming and file-placing behavior from the Fedora >> kernels or in ways that differ -- in case of the swsusp the latter was >> chosen. > Just outline a way that custom kernel packages could be created > Fedora-conform and be supported by kmods, Just use the same scheme that a new flavor in the main package would use. CU thl -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
