"Tom 'spot' Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>An easy to way to fix this would be to have "%{?disttag}" appended to the
>>"Release:" line of the spec by the build system, and have the "." returned
>>by the macro
> ...
> I prefer the %{?disttag:.%{disttag}} syntax for use, if for no other
> reason than it makes the macro a little cleaner.
IMO, the opposite it true... defining the macro happens once at a central
place invisible for most people, but it will be used in hundreds of .spec
files (perhaps). So I would prefer a clear and simple usage.
Enrico
Attachment:
pgpNDC3rweXKf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
