On Monday 28 Feb 2005 21:51, Scott Lawrence wrote: > It looks as though there's a consensus developed around how packages > should be named. Being fairly new to rpm building, I have not > understood all the details of the discussions around how best to > implement those conventions. Might it be possible for one of you who > does understand it to supplement the naming guidelines with a > skeleton .spec file that illustrates how to do it, along with whatever > is required of the surrounding build system? You need to install fedora-rpmdevtools for the rpmbuild directory see: http://fedoranews.org/tchung/rpmbuild/ And for specfiles: http://www.fedora.us/tempspecs/stable/ General ideas see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines And: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines Thanks, G. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 742001 E ghenry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/
Attachment:
pgpyAt0qdZcvJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
