Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-10 15:16:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > ----------------------------------------------- > This package (fontpackages) is approved by oget > ----------------------------------------------- Thank you > Other than this, is there any draft yet for the new guidelines? The new templates are in this rpm (FPC approved). I'll turn them in nice wiki pages and hunt all traces of current guidelines once FESCO has approved it. I don't really see the point of doing it before. This is quite a lot of wiki work and if FESCO asks for changes in the templates this work will have to be done twice. Better to keep the proposal in one place for now IMHO. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fontpackages Short Description: Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Owners: nim Branches: F10, F9, devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review