Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Summary: Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package contains the basic directory layout, spec templates, rpm macros and other materials used to create font packages. This package will serve as base for fonts packaging starting with Fedora 11 It has been approved by FPC today (2008-12-09). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_%282008-11-18%29 (18:51:15) Rathann: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation (18:51:17) ubertibbs: It makes the packages reasonable instead of having 50 lines of identical shell code pasted into them. (18:51:21) spot: +1 from me (18:51:24) hansg: spot: +1 on fonts packaging automation (18:51:28) ubertibbs: +1 from me. (18:51:37) racor: -1 from me (18:51:52) rdieter: +1 (there's good and bad uses of macros, this is an example of the good kind, imo) (18:52:00) ubertibbs: racor: If you want the reference where we asked the Java folks to add the macros, I will dig it out for you. (18:52:02) spot: abadger1999: would you like to vote? (18:52:10) abadger1999: +1 (18:52:21) spot: okay, thats 6 for and 1 against, it passes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes/20081209 (minutes not posted yet) There is currently no hosting source for this project, a demand will be made fedorahosted side but that's no reason not to push the package in rawhide now so packagers can start adapting their packages to the new template(s) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review