Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461899 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2008-12-02 21:19:16 EDT --- I cannot seem to fetch Source0; I think you need http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cqinet/%{name}-%{version}.tgz. You are missing the dependencies for the calls you make in the scriptlets: Requires(post): chkconfig Requires(preun): chkconfig Requires(preun): initscripts Requires(postun): initscripts * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 401646f336b052555abc776e40e94b3990b7c198f2a9ec65bf45ee45acbab6a2 thebridge-1.06.tgz (after fixing Source0: URL so that it downloads) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. X final provides and requires: config(thebridge) = 1.06-2.fc11 thebridge = 1.06-2.fc11 thebridge(x86-64) = 1.06-2.fc11 = /bin/bash /bin/sh config(thebridge) = 1.06-2.fc11 libz.so.1()(64bit) Missing scriptlet dependencies. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets OK (service management). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review